Trending...
- Closeout Kitchens Launches Free AI Kitchen Designer That Lays Out and Prices Real Cabinets
- RAS AP Consulting Advances 1099 Education and Readiness Initiative Through IFOL Training and Finance Technology Showcase
- ALight Technology And Services Limited Advances Through Peachscore + Dealum Accelerator and Join LvlUp Labs
TOMS RIVER, N.J. - JerseyDesk -- Rothstein, Mandell, Strohm, Halm & Cipriani (RMSHC) Partner Robin La Bue recently secured a significant victory before the Supreme Court of New Jersey in Borough of Seaside Park v. Shree Jyoti, LLC, a case that addressed an issue of first impression involving municipal eminent domain law. La Bue argued the case on behalf of the Borough of Seaside Park before the state's highest court. On August 10, 2026, the Supreme Court affirmed the Appellate Division's judgment in favor of the Borough, providing important guidance for municipalities throughout New Jersey.
At the center of the case was whether a municipality must identify the specific intended public use within an ordinance authorizing the acquisition of private property through eminent domain. The dispute arose from Seaside Park's efforts to acquire the Desert Palm Inn property. The property owner challenged the condemnation, arguing in part that the Borough's ordinance was deficient because it did not identify the specific intended use of the property. The Supreme Court ultimately agreed with the Borough's position, holding that neither New Jersey's Eminent Domain Act nor the Local Lands and Buildings Law requires the specific public purpose to be stated within the authorizing ordinance. The Court found that the governing statutes contain no such requirement and declined to impose one that the Legislature had not enacted.
More on Jersey Desk
"I am extremely pleased with the outcome of this case and with the process that led to the Court's decision," said La Bue. "It was an honor to represent the Borough of Seaside Park before the New Jersey Supreme Court on an issue of such importance. This decision provides meaningful clarity for municipalities throughout New Jersey, and I am proud to have played a role in achieving that result."
While ruling in the Borough's favor, the Court also encouraged municipalities to identify an intended public use as early as practicable to promote transparency and allow affected property owners to meaningfully participate in the process. The decision is significant because it resolves a previously unanswered question under New Jersey law and provides greater clarity to municipalities and municipal attorneys navigating eminent domain proceedings. The ruling establishes guidance on what is legally required when local governments authorize the acquisition of property for a public purpose.
For La Bue, the Supreme Court victory reflects a legal practice deeply rooted in New Jersey municipal and land use law. As a Partner at RMSHC, she concentrates her practice in Local Government Law, Land Use and Zoning, Landlord Tenant Law and Real Estate. She is a member of the Ocean County Bar Association and the New Jersey Institute of Local Government Attorneys and is a contributing writer for the Local Government Law Review. Her successful representation of the Borough before the New Jersey Supreme Court further demonstrates RMSHC's experience representing municipalities and public entities in complex legal matters with implications extending beyond an individual community.
More on Jersey Desk
The case is Borough of Seaside Park v. Shree Jyoti, LLC, Supreme Court of New Jersey, A-2-25 (089599).
About RMSHC Attorneys at Law
Rothstein, Mandell, Strohm, Halm & Cipriani is a Toms River, New Jersey-based law firm serving individuals, businesses, municipalities and public entities throughout New Jersey. The firm provides legal counsel across a range of practice areas, including local government law, land use and zoning, real estate and litigation. To learn more, visit rmshc.law.
At the center of the case was whether a municipality must identify the specific intended public use within an ordinance authorizing the acquisition of private property through eminent domain. The dispute arose from Seaside Park's efforts to acquire the Desert Palm Inn property. The property owner challenged the condemnation, arguing in part that the Borough's ordinance was deficient because it did not identify the specific intended use of the property. The Supreme Court ultimately agreed with the Borough's position, holding that neither New Jersey's Eminent Domain Act nor the Local Lands and Buildings Law requires the specific public purpose to be stated within the authorizing ordinance. The Court found that the governing statutes contain no such requirement and declined to impose one that the Legislature had not enacted.
More on Jersey Desk
- Pyrrhic Press Publishing Surpasses 150,000 Downloads, Gains International Business Journal Coverage
- OncoBeta Introduces Rhenium-SCT for Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer at Theageneio Cancer Hospital of Thessaloniki
- Brian G. Miller Co., LLC Receives Tier 1 Ranking in the 2027 Edition of Best Law Firms®
- The Villari Firm, PLLC Named to the 2027 Edition of Best Law Firms
- Bacchus Wine & Spirits and Michelin Guide–Recommended Ethel's Fancy to Host Exclusive LOUIS XIII Limited Edition Diwali Decanter Celebration
"I am extremely pleased with the outcome of this case and with the process that led to the Court's decision," said La Bue. "It was an honor to represent the Borough of Seaside Park before the New Jersey Supreme Court on an issue of such importance. This decision provides meaningful clarity for municipalities throughout New Jersey, and I am proud to have played a role in achieving that result."
While ruling in the Borough's favor, the Court also encouraged municipalities to identify an intended public use as early as practicable to promote transparency and allow affected property owners to meaningfully participate in the process. The decision is significant because it resolves a previously unanswered question under New Jersey law and provides greater clarity to municipalities and municipal attorneys navigating eminent domain proceedings. The ruling establishes guidance on what is legally required when local governments authorize the acquisition of property for a public purpose.
For La Bue, the Supreme Court victory reflects a legal practice deeply rooted in New Jersey municipal and land use law. As a Partner at RMSHC, she concentrates her practice in Local Government Law, Land Use and Zoning, Landlord Tenant Law and Real Estate. She is a member of the Ocean County Bar Association and the New Jersey Institute of Local Government Attorneys and is a contributing writer for the Local Government Law Review. Her successful representation of the Borough before the New Jersey Supreme Court further demonstrates RMSHC's experience representing municipalities and public entities in complex legal matters with implications extending beyond an individual community.
More on Jersey Desk
- Arizona Pest Control Surpasses $200,000 in Contributions to Southern Arizona High School Sports and Education Programs
- ZenaTech (NAS DAQ: ZENA) $1 Million in New Utility Contracts- Potential $2.5 Million Follow-On Opportunity Puts Its Drone Business in the Spotlight!
- New Patient Data Show REQORSA® Activating Cellular Repair Pathways as Roche Collaboration Advances Precision Lung Cancer Strategy for Genprex, Inc
- Genuine Hospitality, LLC Selected to Operate Holiday Inn Express & Suites Jacksonville – Town Center
- Shiokly Launches Online Marketplace to Help Singapore Home-Based Businesses Sell More, With First Product Listed Free
The case is Borough of Seaside Park v. Shree Jyoti, LLC, Supreme Court of New Jersey, A-2-25 (089599).
About RMSHC Attorneys at Law
Rothstein, Mandell, Strohm, Halm & Cipriani is a Toms River, New Jersey-based law firm serving individuals, businesses, municipalities and public entities throughout New Jersey. The firm provides legal counsel across a range of practice areas, including local government law, land use and zoning, real estate and litigation. To learn more, visit rmshc.law.
Source: RMSHC Attorneys
0 Comments
Latest on Jersey Desk
- Logicraft Launches FuelDeck™, AI That Turns Aviation Fuel Tickets Into One Traceable Ledger
- Inaugural OC Tech Week Draws 3,000 From 12 Countries, Sends Finalist to $1M Startup World Cup
- Award-Winning American Hotelier Opens Art-Filled Luxury Cottage in Norfolk, England
- K2 Global / Ozi Amanat Named Among Top 100 AI Venture Capitalists in 2026
- Dr. Latorial Faison Appointed Poet Laureate of Virginia
- AdLeverage Brings Golf Simulator Contest and Home Services Marketing Expertise to Service World Expo 2026
- Cleveland Factory Worker Seeks Funding for AI-Readable Archive Exploring Advanced AI Restraint and Human Survival
- TradeJARnal Launches Innovative Trading Journal to Help Stock and Options Traders Build Discipline and Smarter Trading Habits
- Pursant Founder Mark Herbick Joins STS Capital Partners as CEO
- Tampa Holiday Sessions: Captured by Mallary Opens 2026 Christmas Minis With Two New Sets
- Tampa Web Design Launches New Website for Entrepreneur and Capital Markets Advisor Martin Sumichrast
- Miami Dade College and World Affairs Council of Miami announce Navarro-Cabrera scholarship
- RPP to host first Professional Padel Week in Miami and announce the 2026 USA Awards winners
- UK Financial Ltd. Announces Maya Preferred PRA as First Fully Verified Asset on MAYA CHAIN; Chainlink Proof of Reserve Integration Planned for Network
- The Anchor Project Unveils 2027 Rebrand, Seeks Partners Serving Trafficking and Abuse Survivors
- Bird Nest in Your Dryer Vent? Signs, Risks and What to Do
- Poet Wardah Abbas Featured in Pyrrhic Press Publishing's Ink & Echo With "Hoomins and Other"
- ALight Technology And Services Limited Advances Through Peachscore + Dealum Accelerator and Join LvlUp Labs
- International Misophonia Foundation Launches Sensory Accessible Technology Initiative to Address Overlooked Digital Accessibility Barriers
- Closeout Kitchens Launches Free AI Kitchen Designer That Lays Out and Prices Real Cabinets